Post Thumbnail

MIT scientists find way to make more accurate predictions

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers have developed a new method for evaluating spatial predictions that could significantly improve forecast accuracy across various fields – from weather forecasting to air pollution assessment.

The team of scientists discovered that traditional validation methods can produce serious errors when solving spatial prediction problems. As Tamara Broderick, associate professor of electrical engineering and computer science at MIT, explains, the problem lies in incorrect assumptions about the nature of data.

Classical methods assume that validation and testing data are independent and identically distributed. However, this is often not the case in spatial problems. For example, EPA air pollution sensors are placed considering the location of other sensors, and data from urban and rural areas may have different statistical characteristics.

MIT’s new method is based on the assumption of smooth data changes in space. “Air pollution levels are unlikely to change dramatically between two neighboring houses,” Broderick explains. This approach proved more accurate in most experiments, including wind speed forecasting at Chicago’s O’Hare airport and air temperature in five US metropolises.

The technology can find wide application in various fields:

  • Climatology (sea surface temperature forecasting)
  • Epidemiology (assessing air pollution’s impact on diseases)
  • Meteorology (weather forecasting)
  • Environmental monitoring

The research, supported by the National Science Foundation and Office of Naval Research, will be presented at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.

Autor: AIvengo
For 5 years I have been working with machine learning and artificial intelligence. And this field never ceases to amaze, inspire and interest me.

Latest News

AI music triggers stronger emotions than human music

Have you ever wondered why one melody gives you goosebumps while another leaves you indifferent? Scientists discovered something interesting. Music created by artificial intelligence triggers more intense emotional reactions in people than compositions written by humans.

GPT-5 was hacked in 24 hours

2 independent research companies NeuralTrust and SPLX discovered critical vulnerabilities in the security system of the new model just 24 hours after GPT-5's release. For comparison, Grok-4 was hacked in 2 days, making the GPT-5 case even more alarming.

Cloudflare blocked Perplexity for 6 million hidden requests per day

Cloudflare dealt a crushing blow to Perplexity AI, blocking the search startup's access to thousands of sites. The reason? Unprecedented scale hidden scanning of web resources despite explicit prohibitions from owners!

Threats and $1 trillion don't improve neural network performance

You've surely seen these "secret tricks" for controlling neural networks. Like threats, reward promises, emotional manipulations. But do they actually work? Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Wharton School conducted a large-scale experiment with 5 advanced models: Gemini 1.5 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini and GPT o4-mini.

Anthropic integrated Opus 4.1 into Claude Code and cloud platforms

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.1. This isn't just another update, but a substantial improvement in coding capabilities and agent functionality. What's especially pleasing — the new version is integrated not only into the classic Claude interface, but also into the Claude Code tool. As well as available through API, Amazon Bedrock and Google Cloud Vertex AI.